21 CFR Part 56 IRB Requirements and Oversight
DIAGRAM 1: RISK-MDP "Big 7" IRB Approval Criteria
graph TD
Start["IRB APPROVAL REQUIRES ALL 7 CRITERIA
Missing even 1 = NO APPROVAL"] --> R["π΄ R - RISK IS MINIMIZED
21 CFR 56.111(a)(1)
βββββββββββββ
β Scientifically justified
β No unnecessary exposure
β Risk proportionate
β Use standard procedures
β FAIL: Excessive procedures"]
Start --> I["π‘ I - INFORMED CONSENT
21 CFR 56.111(a)(2)
βββββββββββββ
β Purpose explained
β Risks with frequencies
β Benefits described
β Alternatives listed
β Confidentiality explained
β Right to withdraw
β FAIL: Vague risk language"]
Start --> S["π’ S - EQUITABLE SELECTION
21 CFR 56.111(a)(3)
βββββββββββββ
β Justified inclusion/exclusion
β Fair process
β No unnecessary exclusions
β No vulnerable population exploitation
β FAIL: Exclusions without justification"]
Start --> K["π΅ K - KNOWLEDGEABLE REVIEW
21 CFR 56.111(a)(4)
βββββββββββββ
β Scientific expertise present
β External consultants if needed
β Members understand research area
β FAIL: No relevant expertise"]
Start --> M["π£ M - MONITORING PLAN
21 CFR 56.111(a)(4)
βββββββββββββ
β Safety schedule defined
β Stopping rules established
β AE reporting procedure
β Protocol deviation tracking
β FAIL: No monitoring plan"]
Start --> D["π D - DATA SAFETY & INTEGRITY
21 CFR 56.111(a)(4)
βββββββββββββ
β De-identification where possible
β Secure storage
β Limited access
β Encryption & backups
β FAIL: Unencrypted data"]
Start --> P["β« P - VULNERABLE POPULATIONS
21 CFR 56.111(b)-(d)
βββββββββββββ
β Children: assent required
β Prisoners: minimal-risk only
β Pregnant women: protections
β Cognitive impairment: representative
β FAIL: No extra safeguards"]
R --> Approve["β
ALL 7 MET = IRB APPROVAL"]
I --> Approve
S --> Approve
K --> Approve
M --> Approve
D --> Approve
P --> Approve
DIAGRAM 2: IRB Composition Requirements
graph TD
Comp["IRB COMPOSITION REQUIREMENTS
21 CFR 56.107"] --> Min["REQUIREMENT 1: MINIMUM MEMBERSHIP
βββββββββββββββ
Minimum 5 Members
(Can be more, never fewer)"]
Comp --> Sci["REQUIREMENT 2: SCIENTIFIC MEMBER
βββββββββββββββ
At least 1 member with:
β’ Clinical research design training
β’ Biostatistics knowledge
β’ Current research knowledge
β’ Regulatory knowledge"]
Comp --> NonSci["REQUIREMENT 3: NON-SCIENTIST MEMBER
βββββββββββββββ
At least 1 member who is NOT:
β’ Scientist
β’ Physician
β’ IRB staff member
Examples: Ethics expert, chaplain,
community member, lawyer"]
Comp --> Unafil["REQUIREMENT 4: UNAFFILIATED MEMBER
βββββββββββββββ
At least 1 member with NO affiliation
to the institution (not employed,
no financial interest)
Rationale: External perspective"]
Comp --> Diversity["REQUIREMENT 5: DIVERSITY
βββββββββββββββ
Encourage representation in:
β’ Gender
β’ Race/ethnicity
β’ Professional background
β’ Geographic perspective"]
Comp --> Chair["REQUIREMENT 6: CHAIR DESIGNATION
βββββββββββββββ
IRB must have designated chair
(can be scientist or non-scientist)
Responsible for:
β’ Meetings scheduling
β’ Agenda development
β’ Conflict resolution
β’ IRB governance"]
Comp --> Recusal["REQUIREMENT 7: CONFLICT RECUSAL
βββββββββββββββ
Members must recuse from reviews
where they have:
β’ Financial interest
β’ Employment relationship
β’ Personal/family connection
β’ Research involvement"]
Min --> Final["β
IRB COMPOSITION VALID"]
Sci --> Final
NonSci --> Final
Unafil --> Final
Diversity --> Final
Chair --> Final
Recusal --> Final
DIAGRAM 3: Conflict of Interest Decision Tree
graph TD
Start["IRB MEMBER REVIEWING PROTOCOL
βββββββββββββββ
Potential Conflict of Interest?"] --> Q1{Any relationship with:
Investigator, Sponsor,
or Institution?}
Q1 -->|NO| Continue1["β
CONTINUE REVIEW
No conflict identified"]
Q1 -->|UNSURE| Disclose1["β οΈ DISCLOSE & RECUSE
When in doubt:
disclose to IRB"]
Q1 -->|YES| Q2{Relationship Type?}
Q2 -->|Employment| EmpQ{Works for investigator's
institution?}
EmpQ -->|YES| Recuse1["π« RECUSE
Employment conflict"]
EmpQ -->|NO| Continue2["β
CONTINUE"]
Q2 -->|Financial| FinQ{Any financial interest?}
FinQ -->|Stock/Equity| Recuse2["π« RECUSE
Equity interest"]
FinQ -->|Paid Consulting| Recuse3["π« RECUSE
Consulting income"]
FinQ -->|Patent/Royalty| Recuse4["π« RECUSE
Patent interest"]
FinQ -->|Family Benefits| Recuse5["π« LIKELY RECUSE
Family financial benefit"]
FinQ -->|Unpaid Board| Continue3["β
CONTINUE
No financial benefit"]
FinQ -->|Nominal Gift| Continue4["β
CONTINUE
De minimis amount"]
Q2 -->|Research| ResQ{Involvement level?}
ResQ -->|Investigator| Recuse6["π« RECUSE
Active investigator"]
ResQ -->|Co-Investigator| Recuse7["π« RECUSE
Co-investigator"]
ResQ -->|Lab Provides Materials| Recuse8["π« LIKELY RECUSE
Material provider"]
ResQ -->|Prior Co-publications| Continue5["β
CONTINUE
Historical connection"]
ResQ -->|Different Research Area| Continue6["β
CONTINUE
No research overlap"]
Q2 -->|Personal| PersQ{Type of relationship?}
PersQ -->|Family Member| Recuse9["π« RECUSE
Family conflict"]
PersQ -->|Close Friend| Recuse10["π« LIKELY RECUSE
Friendship bias"]
PersQ -->|Professional in Other Context| Disclose2["β οΈ DISCLOSE
Multiple roles"]
PersQ -->|Professional Only| Continue7["β
CONTINUE
No friendship"]
Recuse1 --> Final["Document in Minutes
Member leaves room
during discussion & vote"]
Recuse2 --> Final
Recuse3 --> Final
Recuse4 --> Final
Recuse5 --> Final
Recuse6 --> Final
Recuse7 --> Final
Recuse8 --> Final
Recuse9 --> Final
Recuse10 --> Final
Disclose1 --> Final
Disclose2 --> Final
Continue1 --> Final
Continue2 --> Final
Continue3 --> Final
Continue4 --> Final
Continue5 --> Final
Continue6 --> Final
Continue7 --> Final
Final --> Standard["STANDARD: 'Objectivity might be questioned'
When in doubt: DISCLOSE & RECUSE"]
DIAGRAM 4: Continuing Review & Approval Timeline
graph TD
Initial["INITIAL IRB APPROVAL
June 1, 2024"] --> Valid["APPROVAL VALID FOR
12 MONTHS"]
Valid --> Deadline["β° CONTINUING REVIEW DEADLINE
June 1, 2025
(EXACTLY 12 months from approval)"]
Deadline --> Choice{Was continuing review
submitted BEFORE deadline?}
Choice -->|YES| Submitted["β
CONTINUING REVIEW SUBMITTED
on time or early"]
Choice -->|NO| Expired["β APPROVAL EXPIRES
Research halts
Regulatory violation"]
Submitted --> IRBReview["IRB Reviews & Approves
Continuing Review"]
IRBReview --> NewApproval["New Approval Issued
June 10, 2025"]
NewApproval --> NewValid["Approval Valid Through
June 1, 2026"]
NewValid --> Continue["β
RESEARCH CONTINUES
with valid approval"]
Continue --> Reminder["β οΈ SET NEW REMINDER
by March 15, 2026
90 days before deadline"]
Expired --> NoEnroll["β NO NEW ENROLLMENT
β RESEARCH MUST STOP
β EXISTING SUBJECTS AT RISK"]
NoEnroll --> Consequences["CONSEQUENCES:
β’ FDA inspection likely
β’ FDA Warning Letter
β’ Data may be invalidated
β’ Investigator discipline"]
style Initial fill:#90EE90
style Valid fill:#87CEEB
style Deadline fill:#FFD700
style Submitted fill:#90EE90
style Expired fill:#FF6B6B
style Continue fill:#90EE90
style NoEnroll fill:#FF6B6B
style Consequences fill:#FF6B6B
DIAGRAM 5: Adverse Event Reporting Process
graph TD
AE["ADVERSE EVENT OCCURS
During Research"] --> Serious{Is it Serious or
Unexpected?}
Serious -->|NO| Monitor["Minor/Expected AE
βββββββββββ
Document in file
Monitor ongoing
Report at continuing review"]
Serious -->|YES| Report["SERIOUS/UNEXPECTED AE
βββββββββββ
Report to IRB
Within 7 DAYS
Do NOT wait for
continuing review"]
Report --> Assessment["IRB SAFETY ASSESSMENT
βββββββββββ
Is research protocol
related to the AE?
Will AE impact risk/benefit?"]
Assessment --> Action1{Conclusion?}
Action1 -->|No change needed| Continue1["β
CONTINUE RESEARCH
Monitor closely
Document in file"]
Action1 -->|Modify protocol| Modify["β οΈ PROTOCOL MODIFICATION
Required
Submit for IRB review
Research pauses pending approval"]
Action1 -->|Stop research| Stop["β HALT RESEARCH
Immediate safety concern
Notify subjects
FDA notification if IND study"]
Continue1 --> FollowUp["Ongoing monitoring
Report at next
continuing review"]
Modify --> IRBApproval["IRB reviews & approves
modifications"]
IRBApproval --> Resume["Resume research
with new protocol"]
Stop --> Investigation["Investigate root cause
Assess subject safety
Notify all relevant parties"]
DIAGRAM 6: Vulnerable Populations - Additional Safeguards
graph TD
VP["VULNERABLE POPULATIONS
21 CFR 56.111(b)-(d)
IF APPLICABLE: ADD SAFEGUARDS"] --> Children["πΆ CHILDREN"]
VP --> Prisoners["π PRISONERS"]
VP --> Pregnant["πͺ PREGNANT WOMEN/FETUSES"]
VP --> Cogn["π§ COGNITIVELY IMPAIRED"]
VP --> Econ["π° ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED"]
Children --> ChildSafe["Additional Requirements:
βββββββββββ
β’ Parental permission required
β’ Age-appropriate assent
β’ Assent process documented
β’ Extra risk minimization
β’ Benefit justification
β’ Community input considered"]
Prisoners --> PrisonSafe["Additional Requirements:
βββββββββββ
β’ Minimal-risk only
β’ Independent advocate present
β’ NO coercion allowed
β’ NO sentence reduction offers
β’ Fair selection process
β’ Monitoring enhanced"]
Pregnant --> PregSafe["Additional Requirements:
βββββββββββ
β’ Minimal-risk OR direct benefit
β’ Fetus protection plan
β’ Pregnant women informed consent
β’ Risk clearly documented
β’ Monitoring for fetal effects
β’ Breastfeeding impact noted"]
Cogn --> CognSafe["Additional Requirements:
βββββββββββ
β’ Legally authorized representative
β’ Surrogate consent required
β’ Subject assent when possible
β’ Enhanced monitoring
β’ Easy withdrawal process
β’ Special communication methods"]
Econ --> EconSafe["Additional Requirements:
βββββββββββ
β’ NOT exploited for easy enrollment
β’ Fair compensation (not coercive)
β’ No undue inducement
β’ Language services provided
β’ Community advisory board
β’ Equitable benefit sharing"]
ChildSafe --> GenSafe["GENERAL SAFEGUARDS
FOR ALL VULNERABLE GROUPS:
βββββββββββ
β Community advisory board
β Enhanced monitoring
β Language/accessibility services
β Extra informed consent detail
β Ongoing training for staff"]
KEY REGULATORY REFERENCES
| Criterion |
CFR Citation |
Key Requirement |
| Risk Minimized |
21 CFR 56.111(a)(1) |
Procedures justified, risk proportionate |
| Informed Consent |
21 CFR 56.111(a)(2) |
Adequate, comprehensive, understandable |
| Equitable Selection |
21 CFR 56.111(a)(3) |
Fair process, no exploitation |
| Knowledgeable Review |
21 CFR 56.111(a)(4) |
IRB has expertise or consultants |
| Monitoring & Safety |
21 CFR 56.111(a)(4) |
Plan defined, stopping rules, AE reporting |
| Data Safety & Integrity |
21 CFR 56.111(a)(4) |
Secure storage, limited access, integrity |
| Vulnerable Populations |
21 CFR 56.111(b)-(d) |
Additional safeguards if applicable |
| IRB Composition |
21 CFR 56.107 |
5+ members, diversity, expertise |
| Conflict of Interest |
21 CFR 56.107(e) |
Recusal when objectivity questioned |
| Continuing Review |
21 CFR 56.109 |
Annual minimum, before expiration |
STUDY TIPS
- Remember RISK-MDP: All 7 approval criteria must be met for IRB approval
- Set reminders: 90 days before approval expiration to prepare continuing review
- When in doubt: Disclose conflicts of interest and allow IRB to make determination
- Serious/Unexpected AEs: Report within 7 daysβdon't wait for continuing review
- Vulnerable populations: Plan extra safeguards during initial protocol design