SOCRA CCRP Exam Preparation — Comprehensive Study Guide
Course Position: Week 7 of 12 (Follows Data Integrity; Precedes Protocol Development)
Regulatory Framework: ICH E2A, 21 CFR 312.32, ICH E6(R2/R3)
Exam Weight: HIGH — Timeline calculations are among the most frequently tested topics
Learning Objectives
By the end of this week, you will be able to:
- Define all AE terminology using ICH E2A standard definitions
- Apply the six SAE criteria to clinical scenarios accurately
- CRITICAL: Distinguish between "serious" and "severe"
- HIGH-YIELD: Calculate IND safety reporting timelines from sponsor awareness
- Determine report type (7-day vs. 15-day) based on event characteristics
- Assess causality using standard relationship categories
- Evaluate expectedness using the Investigator's Brochure as reference
- Describe investigator vs. sponsor safety reporting obligations
- Explain DSMB roles, composition, and communication requirements
Section 1: Adverse Event Terminology
1.1 Adverse Event (AE)
Definition: Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Key Points:
- Broadest category — includes ANY unfavorable sign, symptom, or disease
- NO causality required — temporal association is sufficient
- Includes abnormal laboratory findings
- Includes pre-existing conditions that worsen
- A car accident during a trial IS an adverse event
EXAM TRAP: Questions may present clearly unrelated events — they're STILL adverse events and must be documented.
1.2 Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)
Pre-Approval Definition: All noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product related to any dose.
Post-Marketing Definition: A response to a drug which is noxious and unintended and which occurs at doses normally used in man.
Key Distinction:
- AE = temporal association only (may or may not be drug-related)
- ADR = reasonable possibility of causal relationship exists
1.3 Suspected Adverse Reaction
Definition: An adverse event for which there is a reasonable possibility that the drug caused the adverse event.
Key Points:
- "Reasonable possibility" means relationship cannot be ruled out
- This is the standard for expedited reporting to FDA
- Investigators make initial assessment; sponsors make final determination
1.4 Unexpected Adverse Reaction
Definition: An adverse reaction, the nature or severity of which is not consistent with the Investigator's Brochure (IB).
Two Ways to be "Unexpected":
- Not listed in the IB at all
- Listed but more severe or different in nature than described
EXAM TRAP: An event can be "expected" based on the disease being studied but still be "unexpected" if not listed in the IB for the specific drug.
1.5 SUSAR (Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction)
Combines all three criteria for expedited reporting:
- Serious — meets SAE criteria
- Unexpected — not in IB or more severe
- Suspected — reasonable possibility of causal relationship
Section 2: Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Criteria
An event is SERIOUS if it meets ANY ONE of six criteria:
The Six SAE Criteria
| Criterion | Definition | Key Points |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Death | Results in death | Always SAE regardless of relationship |
| 2. Life-threatening | Immediate risk of death AT THE TIME | Not the same as a "life-threatening illness" |
| 3. Hospitalization | Requires inpatient admission or prolongs existing stay | ER visit WITHOUT admission does NOT qualify |
| 4. Disability | Persistent or significant disruption of normal function | Temporary symptoms that resolve don't count |
| 5. Congenital anomaly | Birth defect in offspring | Pregnancy itself is NOT an SAE |
| 6. Important medical event | May jeopardize patient or require intervention | Requires medical judgment |
Memory Device: DLIHC-B
- Death
- Life-threatening
- Inpatient hospitalization
- Handicap (disability/incapacity)
- Congenital anomaly
- Big medical event (important)
Common SAE Exam Traps
ER Visit Trap:
- Subject treated in ER for 6 hours and discharged → NOT SAE by hospitalization criterion
- Must be inpatient admission to qualify
Elective Surgery Trap:
- Pre-planned knee surgery → NOT SAE
- Post-op complication requiring extended stay → YES SAE
Life-Threatening Trap:
- Cancer diagnosis → Serious (important medical event) but NOT "life-threatening" by criterion
- Anaphylactic shock → YES life-threatening (immediate risk at time of event)
Section 3: SERIOUS vs. SEVERE — The Critical Distinction
This appears on many of the safety-related SOCRA exam questions.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Characteristic | SERIOUS | SEVERE |
|---|---|---|
| Measures | Outcome/Consequence | Intensity/Grade |
| Question | "What happened?" | "How bad was it?" |
| Based on | Regulatory criteria (6 SAE) | Clinical grading scale |
| Triggers reporting? | YES | NO |
| Scale | SAE vs. non-SAE | Mild, Moderate, Severe |
Classic Examples
Severe but NOT Serious:
- Grade 3 headache (10/10 pain), treated at home with OTC medication
- Severity: SEVERE (Grade 3)
- Serious: NO — meets no SAE criteria
Serious but NOT Severe:
- Mild chest discomfort, diagnosed as MI, hospitalized for observation
- Severity: Mild to Moderate
- Serious: YES — requires hospitalization
Severity Grading Scale
| Grade | Severity | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mild | Awareness of symptom, easily tolerated |
| 2 | Moderate | Discomfort interferes with usual activities |
| 3 | Severe | Incapacitating, unable to do usual activities |
| 4 | Life-threatening | Immediate risk of death |
| 5 | Death | Death related to event |
Note: Grade 4 and 5 are always serious by definition. Grades 1-3 may or may not be serious.
Section 4: IND Safety Reporting Requirements (21 CFR 312.32)
The Three-Part Test for Expedited Reporting
ALL THREE conditions must be met:
- SERIOUS — meets at least one SAE criterion
- UNEXPECTED — not in IB or more severe than listed
- SUSPECTED — reasonable possibility of causal relationship
Memory Aid: "SUS Report"
- Serious + Unexpected + Suspected = Expedited Report Required
Report Types and Timelines
| Event Type | Report Type | Phone Required? | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fatal OR Life-threatening + Unexpected + Suspected | 7-Day | YES | Phone ≤7 days; Written ≤15 days |
| Serious (other) + Unexpected + Suspected | 15-Day | NO | Written ≤15 days |
| Follow-up information | Follow-up | NO | ≤15 days from new info |
| Annual summary | Annual | NO | ≤60 days from IND anniversary |
Calculating "Sponsor Awareness"
The clock starts when the SPONSOR first becomes aware — NOT when the event occurs.
Sponsor Awareness STARTS When:
- Sponsor receives notification from investigator
- Sponsor receives info from CRO
- Sponsor's medical monitor reviews case
- ANY employee or agent becomes aware
Clock Does NOT Start When:
- Event occurs (if not yet reported)
- Investigator documents event (if not yet reported)
- Subject reports to site staff (if not yet reported)
Timeline Calculation Example
| Date | Event | Day Count |
|---|---|---|
| March 1 | Event occurs | — |
| March 2 | Site documents AE | — |
| March 5 | Sponsor notified | Day 0 |
| March 12 | 7-day phone due | Day 7 |
| March 20 | 15-day written due | Day 15 |
Section 5: Causality Assessment
Relationship Categories
| Category | Definition | Meets "Reasonable Possibility"? |
|---|---|---|
| Unrelated | No temporal relationship OR clear alternative | NO |
| Unlikely | Alternative explanation more plausible | NO |
| Possible | Temporal relationship; cannot rule out drug | YES |
| Probable | Likely cause; positive dechallenge | YES |
| Definite | Positive rechallenge; no alternative | YES |
The 5 P's of Causality
- Proximate (temporal relationship)
- Pharmacologically plausible
- Positive dechallenge (improved when stopped)
- Positive rechallenge (recurred when restarted)
- Pattern (no alternative explanation)
Who Makes the Assessment?
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Investigator | Initial causality assessment; documents rationale |
| Sponsor | Reviews assessment; may upgrade (rarely downgrade); makes final determination for regulatory reporting |
Section 6: Expectedness Determination
The Reference Document
The Investigator's Brochure (IB) is the definitive source for expectedness determination.
When is an Event UNEXPECTED?
- Not listed in the IB at all
- Listed but more severe than described
- Listed but different in nature than described
Examples
| IB Entry | Observed Event | Expected? |
|---|---|---|
| "Headache" | Headache | Expected |
| "Headache" | Migraine with aura | Unexpected (more severe) |
| "Nausea" | Vomiting requiring IV fluids | Unexpected (more severe) |
| "Rash" | Stevens-Johnson Syndrome | Unexpected (more severe) |
| Nothing listed | Any adverse reaction | Unexpected |
Section 7: Reporting Obligations
Investigator Responsibilities
To Sponsor (21 CFR 312.64):
- Report serious, unexpected, or protocol-required AEs immediately (typically 24 hours)
- Provide follow-up information as available
To IRB (21 CFR 56.108):
- Unanticipated problems involving risks
- Serious AEs per IRB requirements
- Timeline varies by institution
Sponsor Responsibilities
- Report to FDA (not investigator's job!)
- Aggregate safety analysis
- Update Investigator's Brochure
- Notify all participating investigators
EXAM TIP: Investigators report to sponsors; sponsors report to FDA.
Section 8: Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMB)
Purpose
Independent group monitoring patient safety and treatment efficacy during ongoing trials.
Composition
- Clinical experts (2-3 minimum)
- Biostatistician
- Ethicist (often)
- Patient advocate (sometimes)
Key Authority
DSMBs RECOMMEND — they don't decide.
The sponsor makes final decisions. DSMB can recommend:
- Continue trial as planned
- Modify trial
- Temporarily suspend enrollment
- Terminate early (safety, futility, or overwhelming efficacy)
Quick Reference Tables
Table A: Timeline Quick Reference
| Scenario | Report Type | Phone? | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Death + Unexpected + Suspected | 7-Day | YES | 7 days (phone), 15 days (written) |
| Life-threatening + Unexpected + Suspected | 7-Day | YES | 7 days (phone), 15 days (written) |
| Hospitalization + Unexpected + Suspected | 15-Day | NO | 15 days |
| Any serious + Expected | None | NO | Include in annual report |
| Any serious + Unlikely/Unrelated | None | NO | Include in annual report |
Table B: SAE Criteria Quick Reference
| Criterion | Key Phrase | Common Trap |
|---|---|---|
| Death | Results in death | — |
| Life-threatening | Immediate risk at time of event | NOT same as life-threatening illness |
| Hospitalization | Inpatient admission or prolongation | ER visit ≠ hospitalization |
| Disability | Persistent or significant | Transient symptoms don't count |
| Congenital anomaly | Birth defect | Pregnancy itself isn't SAE |
| Important medical event | May jeopardize patient | Requires medical judgment |
Memory Aids Summary
DLIHC-B (SAE Criteria): Death, Life-threatening, Inpatient hospitalization, Handicap, Congenital anomaly, Big medical event
SUS Report (Expedited Reporting): Serious + Unexpected + Suspected = Expedited
7-15 Phone Home (Timelines): 7 days phone (fatal/life-threatening), 15 days written, 60 days annual
Outcome vs. Intensity: Serious = What HAPPENED (outcome) Severe = How BAD (intensity)
Practice Questions Preview
- What distinguishes an AE from an ADR?
- A subject has severe (Grade 3) nausea, treated in ER for 4 hours, discharged. Is this an SAE?
- Calculate deadlines: Sponsor learns of fatal unexpected suspected reaction on March 10.
- Subject is hospitalized for elective surgery. Post-op infection extends stay. What's reportable?
- Causality assessed as "unlikely" for a serious, unexpected event. Expedited report required?
Connection to Course
From Week 6 (Data Integrity):
- ALCOA+ principles apply to safety data
- SDV includes AE/SAE documentation
- Risk-based monitoring focuses on safety-critical data
To Week 8 (Protocol Development):
- Protocol must define AE collection procedures
- Safety monitoring plans built into protocol
- Informed consent addresses known risks (from IB)
- Stopping rules based on safety outcomes
Document prepared for SOCRA CCRP Exam Preparation — Week 7
Regulatory Framework: ICH E2A, 21 CFR 312.32, ICH E6(R2/R3)