Study Conduct and Subject Management
1. Subject Lifecycle Overview
flowchart LR
subgraph Phase1[" "]
A[🎯 RECRUITMENT]
end
subgraph Phase2[" "]
B[🔍 SCREENING]
end
subgraph Phase3[" "]
C[✅ ENROLLMENT]
end
subgraph Phase4[" "]
D[📋 CONDUCT]
end
subgraph Phase5[" "]
E[🏁 CLOSEOUT]
end
A -->|IRB-approved
materials| B
B -->|Consent
obtained| C
C -->|Eligibility
confirmed| D
D -->|Study
completion| E
style A fill:#BB0000,color:#fff,stroke:#990000
style B fill:#CC3333,color:#fff,stroke:#AA2222
style C fill:#666666,color:#fff,stroke:#444444
style D fill:#888888,color:#fff,stroke:#666666
style E fill:#333333,color:#fff,stroke:#111111Key Principle: Subject safety and rights must always prevail over scientific interests (ICH GCP Principle 1)
2. The 8 Basic Elements of Informed Consent
R-R-B-A-C-C-C-V Mnemonic
flowchart TB
subgraph PART1["PART 1: R-R-B-A"]
R1["🔬 R - RESEARCH
Purpose, duration, procedures,
experimental aspects"]
R2["⚠️ R - RISKS
Reasonably expected risks
and discomforts"]
B["✨ B - BENEFITS
Reasonably expected benefits
to subject or others"]
A["💊 A - ALTERNATIVES
Alternative treatments
or procedures available"]
end
subgraph PART2["PART 2: C-C-C-V"]
C1["🔒 C - CONFIDENTIALITY
How records will
be protected"]
C2["💰 C - COMPENSATION
For research-related
injury (if >minimal risk)"]
C3["📞 C - CONTACT
Whom to call for questions,
injury, or rights"]
V["🆓 V - VOLUNTARY
Participation is voluntary,
may withdraw anytime"]
end
R1 --> R2 --> B --> A
C1 --> C2 --> C3 --> V
style R1 fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style R2 fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style B fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style A fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style C1 fill:#666666,color:#fff
style C2 fill:#666666,color:#fff
style C3 fill:#666666,color:#fff
style V fill:#666666,color:#fffCitation: 21 CFR 50.25(a)(1-8)
3. Visit Window Calculation: The TED Formula
flowchart LR
subgraph FORMULA["TED FORMULA"]
T["📅 TARGET
Scheduled Date"]
E["⬅️ EARLIEST
Target − Window"]
D["➡️ LATEST
Target + Window"]
end
T --- E
T --- D
style T fill:#BB0000,color:#fff,stroke:#990000
style E fill:#157524,color:#fff,stroke:#0D4D17
style D fill:#157524,color:#fff,stroke:#0D4D17Example Calculation
flowchart TB
subgraph SCENARIO["Week 8 Visit | Target: March 15 | Window: ±5 days"]
EARLIEST["EARLIEST
March 10
(15 - 5 = 10)"]
TARGET["TARGET
March 15
(Ideal date)"]
LATEST["LATEST
March 20
(15 + 5 = 20)"]
end
EARLIEST ---|"Valid Window"| TARGET
TARGET ---|"Valid Window"| LATEST
style EARLIEST fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724,stroke:#28A745
style TARGET fill:#BB0000,color:#fff,stroke:#990000
style LATEST fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724,stroke:#28A745Window Decision Tree
flowchart TD
START["Actual Visit Date"] --> CHECK{"Is Actual Date
within Window?"}
CHECK -->|"Earliest ≤ Actual ≤ Latest"| VALID["✅ VALID
Within Window"]
CHECK -->|"Actual < Earliest OR
Actual > Latest"| DEVIATION["❌ DEVIATION
Out of Window"]
DEVIATION --> DOC["Document:
1. Date discovered
2. Date occurred
3. Description
4. Root cause
5. Impact"]
DOC --> CAPA["Complete CAPA:
• Corrective Action
• Preventive Action"]
style VALID fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style DEVIATION fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C24
style DOC fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style CAPA fill:#CCE5FF,color:#0040854. Three Types of Withdrawal
flowchart TB
subgraph TYPES["WITHDRAWAL TYPES"]
direction TB
subgraph T1["TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL"]
T1A["🛑 Stops study drug ONLY"]
T1B["📋 Continues assessments"]
T1C["👁️ Safety monitoring continues"]
T1D["📊 Data collection continues"]
end
subgraph T2["PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL"]
T2A["🛑 Stops drug AND most assessments"]
T2B["📋 Minimal safety follow-up only"]
T2C["👁️ Limited monitoring"]
T2D["📊 Reduced data collection"]
end
subgraph T3["COMPLETE WITHDRAWAL"]
T3A["🛑 Stops ALL participation"]
T3B["📋 No further assessments"]
T3C["❌ No contact allowed"]
T3D["📊 Prior data retained"]
end
end
style T1 fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style T2 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style T3 fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C24Withdrawal Decision Flowchart
flowchart TD
START["Subject expresses
desire to stop"] --> LISTEN["Listen without
pressure"]
LISTEN --> PRESENT["Present ALL options:
Continue, Treatment WD,
Partial WD, Complete WD"]
PRESENT --> DECISION{"Subject's
Decision?"}
DECISION -->|"Continue with
support"| CONTINUE["Document discussion
Address concerns
Schedule follow-up"]
DECISION -->|"Treatment
Withdrawal"| TWD["Stop drug only
Continue visits
Safety monitoring
Stays in ITT"]
DECISION -->|"Partial
Withdrawal"| PWD["Stop drug
Minimal visits
Survival follow-up
Stays in ITT"]
DECISION -->|"Complete
Withdrawal"| CWD["Stop everything
No further contact
Prior data retained
Stays in ITT"]
style START fill:#CCE5FF,color:#004085
style CONTINUE fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style TWD fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style PWD fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style CWD fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C245. Withdrawal vs. Lost to Follow-Up (LTFU)
flowchart TB
subgraph COMPARISON["CRITICAL DISTINCTION"]
direction LR
subgraph WD["WITHDRAWAL"]
WD1["✋ ACTIVE decision"]
WD2["💬 Subject communicates"]
WD3["📝 Document immediately"]
WD4["✅ Respect decision"]
end
subgraph LTFU["LOST TO FOLLOW-UP"]
LTFU1["❓ NO active decision"]
LTFU2["📵 Unable to contact"]
LTFU3["📋 Document ALL attempts"]
LTFU4["⏳ Exhaust due diligence"]
end
end
style WD fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style LTFU fill:#666666,color:#fff6. SWOG 3-2-1 Rule for LTFU
flowchart TD
subgraph RULE["SWOG 3-2-1 RULE"]
THREE["3️⃣ THREE
Minimum 3 contact attempts
at different times/days"]
TWO["2️⃣ TWO
Over minimum
2-year period"]
ONE["1️⃣ ONE
At least 1 attempt
must be certified letter"]
end
THREE --> TWO --> ONE
style THREE fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style TWO fill:#CC3333,color:#fff
style ONE fill:#DD4444,color:#fffLTFU Contact Process
flowchart TD
START["Subject misses
scheduled visit"] --> ATTEMPT1["Attempt 1:
Phone call
(different time of day)"]
ATTEMPT1 -->|"No response"| ATTEMPT2["Attempt 2:
Text/Email
(if consented)"]
ATTEMPT2 -->|"No response"| ATTEMPT3["Attempt 3:
Regular mail"]
ATTEMPT3 -->|"No response"| CERT["REQUIRED:
Certified letter
with tracking"]
CERT -->|"No response"| EMERGENCY["Contact emergency
contacts (per consent)"]
EMERGENCY -->|"No response"| PUBLIC["Check public records
(obituaries, SSDI)
per HIPAA 45 CFR 164.512(i)"]
PUBLIC -->|"No information"| LTFU_STATUS["Document as LTFU
after due diligence
completed"]
subgraph DOCUMENTATION["DOCUMENT EACH ATTEMPT"]
DOC1["📅 Date & Time"]
DOC2["📞 Method used"]
DOC3["📱 Contact info used"]
DOC4["📝 Result/Outcome"]
DOC5["✍️ Staff initials"]
end
style CERT fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style LTFU_STATUS fill:#666666,color:#fff7. Compliance Assessment Hierarchy
flowchart TB
subgraph HIERARCHY["MOST OBJECTIVE → LEAST OBJECTIVE"]
BIO["🔬 BIOMARKERS
Drug levels in blood/urine
MOST OBJECTIVE"]
ELEC["📱 ELECTRONIC MONITORING
MEMS caps, smart bottles"]
PILL["💊 PILL COUNTS
Dispensed vs. returned"]
DIARY["📓 PATIENT DIARIES
Self-reported logs"]
SELF["🗣️ SELF-REPORT
Verbal confirmation
LEAST OBJECTIVE"]
end
BIO --> ELEC --> PILL --> DIARY --> SELF
style BIO fill:#006600,color:#fff
style ELEC fill:#228B22,color:#fff
style PILL fill:#666666,color:#fff
style DIARY fill:#999999,color:#fff
style SELF fill:#BB0000,color:#fff8. Recruitment Materials Decision Tree
flowchart TD
CONTENT["Review Recruitment
Material Content"] --> Q1{"Claims treatment
is 'safe' or 'effective'?"}
Q1 -->|"YES"| REJECT1["❌ PROHIBITED
No efficacy claims allowed"]
Q1 -->|"NO"| Q2{"Uses 'FREE' for
study drug?"}
Q2 -->|"YES"| REJECT2["❌ PROHIBITED
Cannot use 'free' for
investigational products"]
Q2 -->|"NO"| Q3{"Contains exculpatory
language?"}
Q3 -->|"YES"| REJECT3["❌ PROHIBITED
21 CFR 50.20 violation"]
Q3 -->|"NO"| Q4{"Emphasizes payment
as primary benefit?"}
Q4 -->|"YES"| REJECT4["❌ PROHIBITED
Undue inducement"]
Q4 -->|"NO"| Q5{"IRB approved?"}
Q5 -->|"NO"| SUBMIT["Submit to IRB
for review"]
Q5 -->|"YES"| APPROVE["✅ ACCEPTABLE
May be used"]
style REJECT1 fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C24
style REJECT2 fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C24
style REJECT3 fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C24
style REJECT4 fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C24
style APPROVE fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style SUBMIT fill:#FFF3CD,color:#8564049. Re-Consent Triggers
flowchart TD
TRIGGERS["When is RE-CONSENT required?"]
TRIGGERS --> T1["📝 Protocol amendment
affecting risk/benefit"]
TRIGGERS --> T2["⚠️ New safety
information emerges"]
TRIGGERS --> T3["🧠 Subject's capacity
changes"]
TRIGGERS --> T4["🎂 Minor becomes
adult (18 years)"]
TRIGGERS --> T5["🔬 Significant new
findings discovered"]
T1 --> ACTION
T2 --> ACTION
T3 --> ACTION
T4 --> ACTION
T5 --> ACTION
ACTION["RE-CONSENT PROCESS:
1. New signature on updated form
2. Date of re-consent
3. Who conducted discussion
4. Copy provided to subject
5. Version number documented"]
style TRIGGERS fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style ACTION fill:#D4EDDA,color:#15572410. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis
flowchart LR
subgraph ITT["INTENT-TO-TREAT PRINCIPLE"]
RAND["Subject
Randomized"] --> ANALYZED["Analyzed in
Original Group"]
end
subgraph APPLIES["APPLIES REGARDLESS OF:"]
A1["Withdrawal"]
A2["Non-compliance"]
A3["Protocol deviation"]
A4["Loss to follow-up"]
end
RAND -.->|"Once randomized
ALWAYS analyzed"| A1
RAND -.->|"Once randomized
ALWAYS analyzed"| A2
RAND -.->|"Once randomized
ALWAYS analyzed"| A3
RAND -.->|"Once randomized
ALWAYS analyzed"| A4
style RAND fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style ANALYZED fill:#157524,color:#fffWhy ITT Matters:
- Preserves randomization benefits
- Prevents selection bias
- Reflects real-world effectiveness
- FDA requirement for primary efficacy analysis
Citation: ICH E9(R1)
11. Special Populations: Additional Protections
flowchart TB
subgraph POPULATIONS["45 CFR 46 SUBPARTS"]
direction TB
subgraph B["SUBPART B: Pregnant Women"]
B1["Minimal risk to fetus"]
B2["Father's consent may be required"]
B3["Research must address maternal/fetal health"]
end
subgraph C["SUBPART C: Prisoners"]
C1["Special IRB composition"]
C2["Limited to prison-related research"]
C3["Cannot use for parole consideration"]
end
subgraph D["SUBPART D: Children"]
D1["Parent PERMISSION"]
D2["Child ASSENT (typically 7+)"]
D3["Prospect of direct benefit required"]
end
end
style B fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style C fill:#856404,color:#fff
style D fill:#1976D2,color:#fffPediatric Consent Process
flowchart TD
START["Pediatric Research
Subject Identified"] --> PARENT["PARENT/GUARDIAN
PERMISSION
(Adult consent elements)"]
PARENT -->|"Permission granted"| AGE{"Child's
Age?"}
AGE -->|"Under 7"| ASSENT_WAIVED["Assent typically
not required"]
AGE -->|"7-17"| ASSENT["CHILD ASSENT
Age-appropriate explanation
Child's affirmative agreement"]
ASSENT -->|"Assent given"| ENROLLED["✅ ENROLLED"]
ASSENT -->|"Child dissents"| DISSENT["Generally cannot
override dissent"]
PARENT -->|"Permission denied"| NOT_ENROLLED["❌ NOT ENROLLED"]
style PARENT fill:#BB0000,color:#fff
style ASSENT fill:#666666,color:#fff
style ENROLLED fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style DISSENT fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C2412. ICH E6(R3) Transition Timeline
timeline
title ICH E6 Evolution
1996 : E6(R1) Original GCP
: Foundation of clinical trial conduct
2016 : E6(R2) First Revision
: Risk-based monitoring
: Electronic records guidance
2024 : E6(R3) Published
: Decentralized trials
: eConsent provisions
2026 : E6(R3) Effective
: January 1, 2026
: Full implementation requiredE6(R3) Key Changes
mindmap
root((ICH E6 R3))
Risk-Based Quality Management
Proportionate monitoring
Critical data focus
Quality tolerance limits
Decentralized Trials
Remote visits
Direct-to-patient shipping
Telemedicine assessments
Electronic Consent
21 CFR Part 11 compliance
Remote consent capability
Comprehension verification
Digital Health Technologies
Wearables
Mobile apps
Electronic diaries
Participant-Centric
Reduced burden
Flexible scheduling
Local testing options13. Case Study Decision Framework: Mrs. Johnson
flowchart TD
SCENARIO["Mrs. Johnson, Week 32
• Grade 1 nausea
• Daughter's wedding next month
• Time commitment concerns"]
SCENARIO --> LISTEN["LISTEN without pressure
Acknowledge concerns"]
LISTEN --> ASSESS["ASSESS:
Is this withdrawal request
or problem-solving need?"]
ASSESS --> OPTIONS["PRESENT ALL OPTIONS
(No pressure, no coercion)"]
OPTIONS --> O1["OPTION 1: Continue
• Address nausea (antiemetics)
• Schedule around wedding
• Reduce burden if possible"]
OPTIONS --> O2["OPTION 2: Treatment WD
• Stop study drug
• Continue safety visits
• Addresses time concerns"]
OPTIONS --> O3["OPTION 3: Partial WD
• Stop drug
• Minimal follow-up only"]
OPTIONS --> O4["OPTION 4: Complete WD
• Her absolute right
• No further contact
• Prior data retained"]
O1 --> DOC
O2 --> DOC
O3 --> DOC
O4 --> DOC
DOC["DOCUMENT:
• Discussion date/time
• Options presented
• Subject's decision
• Rationale given"]
style SCENARIO fill:#CCE5FF,color:#004085
style O1 fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style O2 fill:#D4EDDA,color:#155724
style O3 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style O4 fill:#F8D7DA,color:#721C2414. Exam Quick Reference: High-Yield Topics
mindmap root((WEEK 9
HIGH-YIELD)) Consent Elements R-R-B-A-C-C-C-V 8 basic required 6 additional when applicable ClinicalTrials.gov statement Visit Windows TED Formula Target ± Days Deviation documentation CAPA requirements Withdrawal 3 types T-P-C Active decision Data retention ITT analysis LTFU NOT withdrawal SWOG 3-2-1 Rule Documentation required HIPAA provisions Recruitment IRB approval required No efficacy claims No exculpatory language 21 CFR 50.20
15. Common Exam Traps
flowchart TB
subgraph TRAPS["⚠️ COMMON EXAM TRAPS"]
direction TB
TRAP1["❌ TRAP: Confusing withdrawal types
✅ FIX: Treatment = drug only,
Partial = limited follow-up,
Complete = all contact ends"]
TRAP2["❌ TRAP: Miscounting window days
✅ FIX: Use TED formula:
Earliest = Target - Window
Latest = Target + Window"]
TRAP3["❌ TRAP: Missing exculpatory language
✅ FIX: Look for 'waive,' 'release,'
'hold harmless' - ALL prohibited"]
TRAP4["❌ TRAP: Treating LTFU as withdrawal
✅ FIX: Withdrawal = active decision,
LTFU = unable to contact"]
TRAP5["❌ TRAP: Forgetting re-consent triggers
✅ FIX: Amendment affecting risk,
new safety info, capacity change,
minor turns 18"]
end
style TRAP1 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style TRAP2 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style TRAP3 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style TRAP4 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404
style TRAP5 fill:#FFF3CD,color:#856404Quick Reference Tables
Common Visit Windows
| Visit Type | Typical Window | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Screening | ±7-14 days | Flexibility for scheduling |
| Weekly | ±2-3 days | Tight control, frequent visits |
| Monthly | ±5-7 days | Standard follow-up |
| Quarterly | ±14-21 days | Less frequent monitoring |
Regulatory Citations
| Topic | Citation |
|---|---|
| Exculpatory language prohibition | 21 CFR 50.20 |
| 8 basic consent elements | 21 CFR 50.25(a)(1-8) |
| 6 additional consent elements | 21 CFR 50.25(b) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov statement | 21 CFR 50.25(c) |
| Right to withdraw | 21 CFR 50.25(a)(8) |
| IRB review of recruitment | 21 CFR 56.109(a) |
| LTFU due diligence | 21 CFR 312.62(b) |
| HIPAA research exception | 45 CFR 164.512(i) |
| Vulnerable populations | 45 CFR 46 Subparts B, C, D |
| Visit windows/deviations | ICH E6(R2) Section 4.5 |
| ITT analysis | ICH E9(R1) |
SOCRA CCRP Exam Preparation Course | Week 9 Visual Learning Aids Study Conduct and Subject Management